|
|
|
|
 |
Forensic Acoustics Case Study
|
| <<
prev | 1 |
2 |
3 | 4 |
next
>> |
INITIAL INVESTIGATION
Measurements of sound in the areas where the employees
transacted their business and waited for the truck loading
to be completed revealed levels in the mid- to high 70
dB(A) range. The employees spend approximately two hours
at this location before leaving on deliveries.
The relatively low level of the noise exposure prompted
us to ask for a sample of audiograms of the claimants
for further analysis. As the noise exposures were so low,
we wanted to know hat thresholds were shown by some of
the claimants. The attorneys provided a sample of eighty
audiograms.
INSUFFICIENT NOISE LEVELS
Conparison of Hearing Threshold with Standard
The second figure shows a comparison of the threshold of
an employee in this case with the thresholds predicted
for the population by the standards. We found that the
hearing levels claimed by the employees did not all show
a typical 3KHz notch pattern for NIHL were substantially
more severe than would be predicted for the measured noise
exposures.
|
 |
Distribution of Hearing Levels
A further discrepancy was found in the hearing thresholds
themselves. The employees ranged in age from 26 years
to over 70 years old. All the hearing thresholds however,
fell within approximately 10 dB of one another. For this
range of ages, considering different sensitivities of
individuals to noise and different rates of development
of presbycusis, a range of 40 dB would be more typical.
|
| <<
prev | 1 |
2 |
3 | 4 |
next
>> |
|

|
|
|
|
|
|