|
|
|
|
 |
Forensic Acoustics Case Study
|
| <<
prev | 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
next
>> |
DOSE / RESPONSE
We recognize that over the past forty years rigorous,
scientifically defensible dose/response relations have
been established between noise exposure and the development
of threshold deficits. These relationships have been widely
published as International (ISO 1999 xx) and National
(ANSI S3.44 xxx) Standards. These documents provide a
basis on which to compare the hearing thresholds exhibited
by an individual exposed to noise with the hearing thresholds
of a large population of individuals similarly exposed.
Furthermore, because the standards are based on a large
body of data, it is possible to predict the hearing thresholds
of individuals who are more and less sensitive to the
effects of noise exposure.
Keep in mind, however, that the standards do not predict
the thresholds of any particular noise exposed worker.
They only permit comparisons between an individual and
a group.
An example of the data provided in the standards is shown
in the first figure. The figure shows the expected hearing
threshold for a male, age 50, exposed to 90 dB TWA for
20 and 30 years. The curves shown represent the population
of average susceptibility to noise and the most sensitive
10 percent of the population.
|
 |
We also know, from the age adjustment tables in the OSHA
Hearing Conservation Amendment, that as a population ages,
its hearing, on average, becomes poorer. This suggests
that if audiograms from a large group of workers of widely
varying ages were compared, we should expect to find a
range of hearing thresholds. It follows that if the workers
were exposed to levels of noise insufficient to cause
hearing loss, workers of different ages should exhibit
different audiometric profiles. Any departure from these
finding are cause for consternation.
|
| <<
prev | 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
next
>> |
|

|
|
|
|
|
|